Biodiversity, Cites, Conservation, Endangered Species, Environment, Extinction, Illegal Timber Trade, Illegal Trade, Wildlife, Wildlife Trade, Wildlife Trafficking Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsored Article published by dilrukshi Banner image of a rhino-horned lizard (Ceratophora stoddartii), a species endemic to Sri Lanka and one of several being proposed for increased trade protection under CITES. Image courtesy of Anslem de Silva. An international summit on the global wildlife trade will be moved from Sri Lanka to Switzerland, following a lengthy delay sparked by terrorist bombings in the South Asian country during Easter services in April.The 18th Meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP18) of CITES was originally scheduled to run May 23 to June 3 in Colombo, but will now take place in Geneva from Aug. 17 to 28.The CITES announcement follows a comprehensive U.N. security assessment that concluded on May 31.There was pressure to get the summit going with minimal delay, given the number of conservation programs and activities dependent on the outcome of the meeting, for which delegates had proposed increased trade protections for a host of plant and animal species. More than seven weeks after a series of deadly Easter Sunday bombings rocked Sri Lanka, an international summit on the wildlife trade originally scheduled to take place in Colombo last May has now been shifted to Geneva.The announcement on the rescheduling of the 18th Meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP18) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) was made June 12, amid growing concern from conservationists over the delay.The meeting will now take place from Aug. 17 to 28 in Geneva, home to the CITES headquarters, CITES Secretary-General Ivonne Higuero said in a statement.“This conclusion was reached after a consultation process with the CITES Standing Committee where they expressed their security and other concerns, and after careful consideration of the report of the mission of the United Nations Department of Safety and Security to Sri Lanka to assess the security situation on the ground, and discussions with the Sri Lankan government,” Higuero said.Sri Lanka’s commercial capital, Colombo, had been slated to host the top-level event from May 23 through June 3. But organizers announced April 26 that the event was indefinitely postponed, in the aftermath of the devastating bomb blasts that struck a series of churches and hotels in Colombo and surrounding areas on April 21 and claimed 258 lives.The U.N., whose environmental agency administers the CITES Secretariat, carried out a security assessment to determine whether the summit could still be held in Sri Lanka, with local organizers hopeful it would go ahead. John Amaratunga, Sri Lanka’s tourism minister, told Mongabay in May that there was every likelihood the conference could be hosted in September or October, without a venue change. “It is still possible to play host,” he said.But despite the Sri Lankan government’s efforts to retain Colombo as the host venue, the U.N.’s security assessment that was concluded on May 31 advised against it.In a statement, the CITES Secretariat said it had consulted with stakeholders including the Sri Lankan government and the U.N.’s security department, and concluded that CoP18 “should be held in Geneva, Switzerland, in the earliest possible dates.”There was pressure to get the summit going with minimal delay. Numerous conservation programs and activities are dependent on the outcome of the meeting, for which delegates had proposed increased trade protections for a host of plant and animal species.“There is no doubt that this extraordinary situation in which the Convention and the Secretariat find themselves requires sacrifices to adjust to the consequences of the decision to change venue and dates,” Higuero said. “The aim of many of the Standing Committee Members was to ensure that the meeting would take place as soon as possible to take the decisions needed to address sustainability of trade in wildlife.”She also expressed her gratitude to the Sri Lankan government for its understanding, adding, “It has been a very distressing time for all concerned.”Vidya Abhayagunawardane, a Sri Lankan environmentalist who facilitated the destruction of a major stockpile of elephant ivory in 2015, told Mongabay that it was regrettable but understandable that the CITES Secretariat had decided not to host the meeting in Colombo after all.“While it would have given a tremendous boost for conservation efforts here and highlight the island’s unique biodiversity, an adverse decision had to be expected in the light of the April 21 bombings,” he said.The Sri Lankan government has put the economic impact of the Easter Sunday terrorist attacks on the island’s tourism industry at a conservative estimate of about $2 billion. A multi-sectoral assessment of the economic cost to the country is expected to be much higher.
February 10, 2020